So someones sexual turn on, sexual fantasy has nothing to do with their opinions? So if someone is against child abuse, but their sexual fantasy, their 'turn on' is sex with children, that these two contradictions are perfectly logical? Because your logic deems that acceptable. Next... physical abuse and assault come in many forms. Yes I think people who can be into S&M can be against abuse... but what you are missing is a little thing know as context. Dripping hot candle wax, and being against child abuse = yes! Being against abuse of woman, and dominating them as your turn on = no!