Well to be honest alot of things in the first 4 episodes already deviate alot from the books so some things really would spoil it for me as well dispite having read everything.

Also Schrodinger's cat is NOT scientific. it is semantics(I would accept philosophy or logic)

Well it is not that hard if you know that when something is the first it does not magically disappear when the second one arrives. Would be really troublesome with generations as well.

If you don't see anything wrong here I suppose you are an ass*

That is granted. But I will take this with me and when I speak with someone who is an expert i will ask it, hopefully I will become wiser through that ^^

I prefer being a prisoner but have my body kept sacred than being violated and become even a prisoner in my own body.

You mean as in Quantum Mechanics? But still, the presupposition of Enlightenment is that everything that can not be measured do not exist. There just has to be an distinction between that what cannot be measured and that which has not yet been measured.

Religious people say I am religious, atheistic people say i am atheistic. What I have found, is that they most of the time are not that far apart. The reason why 'both parties' communicate so badly is because they have all these premisses over what the other believes that they cannot truly communicate about believes, God and religion. I sometimes try it on the internet, but it is hard to express it properly because it presupposes so much that it might as well have taken a few hours in depth discussion, and we simply never have the time, energy or possibility for that.

It might even be that me calling it religious or religion is the wrong word, maybe we should make a distinction between that and faith or something. I don't know for sure here either. But people talk about religion and theism as if they are the same thing, so how am I to understand clearly what is being understood under all of those from their perspective?

The interpretation that many people have of God who have not studied the bible, or been raised which religion, deviates tremendously from that of religious people, in general sense. Most people have only the Greek philosophical idea of God in their mind, but God in the bible was never used as omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent. God as personification is a mere symbolic interpretation of the goal and meaning of live, to live together, to love together, to forgive each other. To see God is only to see how to live your live so that you can love yourself as you can equally love another.

It is indeed a society next to our society, but controlling the masses? To me it seems you look for function, use and objectivity in this, am I right? Because if that is what you seek no answer I can give can satisfy you ,because religion goes beyond that(it is complete subjectivity).

And in different proportions, I suppose that is a matter of debate because I do not have the exact knowledge on that at this point, but up to now religious people have always heavily outweighed non religious people, and all movements have their highs and lows, so I am not sure if even a decisive answer can be given to this.

No I admit, I have not watched it:p But I mean.., that is something different and less worse than rape I think or is that just me?