I've read my fair share of both mainstream and obscure literature pertaining to timeless wisdom and existential questions (early religious myths, early forms of mysticism, occult stuff, eastern ideas, etc but admittedly not Oera Linde) Many interesting ideas to contemplate on, but ultimately choosing to believe one over the other is literally how religion works, and that kind of thinking doesn't mesh well with finding the "real" truth in my opinion. Oera Linde's wisdom might resonate with you but I don't see how that makes any of its historical claims true.

By "moderate" discussion I mean literally that, being moderate in leaps of faith. Having a discussion atleast somewhat based in reality is not a normie discussion. It's one thing believing Atlantis or some analogue was real, connecting it with DMT beings is in another league completely. From what I've seen so far, these DMT beings can be any of the following

> Demiurge's archontic enslavers
> Satan's demons
> interdimensional aliens
> machine elves
> The Pleiadians
> now apparently aliens from beyond Sirius and potentially Atlantians?

Why not though? Have you tried it?

I personally believe there are things we are not capable of comprehending, yet alone discussing. It's egotistical to think we know any more than 1% of everything, but it's also egotistical to disregard every established fact just to go against the grain. In this specific case, it takes many more leaps of faith for me to believe that Atlantis was real and had advanced technology than to believe otherwise.

1. Give me 3 hard facts about Tartaria that you would like to teach children in school.

2. This is such a "top of the iceberg" argument, I expected more from a seasoned conspiracist. They were good at measuring and had a lot of time?

" it's simply not possible to create with hand tools"
Try having 100+ people working on it for 100+ years with hand tools and report back.

Love me some nonsense new age syncretisms. Also sprinkle DMT beings in there for good measure.

Is there no moderates when it comes do discussions like this? Okay yea, maybe an ancient, highly advanced civilization existed long before Mesopotamian civilization. It's possible. Let's even venture as far to say that the media(tm) is for some reason covering this fact up (the reason is almost always some crypto-gnostic or pseudo-christian paranoia. There's also the more rational possibility that it did indeed exist, but we simply have no evidence of it). What's up with DMT then? Beings from beyond Sirius? There's literally no reason to add these in except because they sound cool.

Plato came up with Atlantis as a metaphor in Timaeus. Even if it existed at some point, most of what we "know" about it was added later, and even now we keep associating with new stuff that isn't even remotely related. In the meantime there was a plethora of other cliche "mythical land" myths, and esoteric and religious ideas in general that' can't all be true. What makes Oera Linde any more true than other books of this kind?

So even if you don't trust the established media, there should be a hint of restraint and common sense when discussing topics like this one, especially since you're likely to never get evidence for any of it.

Agree, we should instead study history from obscure yt videos and /x/ schizo posts

> google "do eggs increase cholesterol"
> click first link
> "cholesterol in eggs doesn't seem to raise cholesterol levels"

This is the type of guy to say "do your own research"

Your "extrapolation" is a product of a twitter brain if I've ever seen one.

this was revealed to you in a dream

Yet another incredibly nuanced, high iq take by memewerfer. We are truly blessed by your presence alone on this site.