it was like 270k, tops

>"Also it likes being bitten"

My pleasure

(I feel this is a "task failed successfully"-moment)

The fem>BOY< by necessity has the fundamental essence of a boy in addition to his female essence, whereas a fem>GIRL< has the essence both of a female and a girl.

This reduces the fundamental question to the following:
Is it, as a man, more homosexual to be attracted to a BOY rather than a GIRL?
And the answer is of course that the former is more gay than the latter.

As Aristotle said,
"Amicus Willywerkel, sed magis amica veritas"
(translated from Latin: "Willywerkel is my friend, but truth is a better friend")

She kinda looks like Ashley from HUGELOL's favorite game though (thus above mid)

I felt this way about "Brave new world"
(In "1984" the government will turn up and beat the shit out of you if you complain, in "Brave new world" they will give you happy pills and a state assigned gf to make you complacent)

Rumor has it I'm actually from Bulgaria

I doubt the first half since it in practice would mean that society in effect tolerates the gay space to be "everywhere" (i.e., the gays can be openly flirtatious in public). (Plus the problem of being perceived as hetero by women seems like a non-issue?)

The second half is more interesting: I know that in many traditional (and less tolerant) societies only the receiver is considered "gay" (feminine/sissy) whereas the one who penetrates is considered "normal" (masculine), but I assumed that this meant that the sissies would hide more in the less tolerant societies?

People weren't ready for it is all, keep the posts coming and they'll see the light soon enough

I honestly don't know.
I tried reading up on sexuality a while back which is when I stumbled on the differences between sissy (gender non-conforming) and gender conforming, which was news to me.

The gender roles-explanation doesn't seem too convincing to me without additional evidence: they may very well be the target of additional harassment, but that doesn't *prove* that the worse outcomes are caused by the harassment, just like the homosexuality isn't necessarily caused by the molestation but rather the other way around (homosexuality causing the gender non-conforming behaviour as well as increasing the risk of molestation). Comparing the outcomes of non-conforming people in tolerant and intolerant environments respectively (after matching for background variables) could be used to test it, but I know of no such study.

But as I said, I honestly don't know. I thought that people were picked on for *being gay* and that -- for some to me unknown reason -- some gay people "choose" to act like sissies as part of their gay identity (rather than the "sissiness" being innate and predating the the sexual behaviour, as it apparently is)