Well that's always nice to hear.That is a first for me, hearing such a thing.Perhaps things are becoming better with time.As long as it's going both ways i have no objections.For now.. it's not but one day i hope it will.

Must i repeat myself: "Where exactly did you see a feminist supporting men's rights?"

Leave the 9/11 example i thought i'd help for making a neutral view on the matter but it seems to have failed."Focusing" is the right word.But focusing means you're also doing other stuff like i dunno men's rights or something.I think helping women more is a good approach but just flat out helping only women is wrong.If feminists actually only "focused" on women's rights and helped out men too i'd even become one.

You're trying to introduce the idea of being positively sexist.I'm talking about sexist as a bad thing.The definition of sexism is unfair treatment due to gender.And it is something that i'd say most people have in mind when using it.When you're being negatively sexist or you are discriminating on ones gender(i had to make this clear cause you wont shut up about it for some reason) i'd say you do it to the other ONE GENDER(god f*cking dammit you're so tiring).Okay you know what i'm going to use your words so you don't get confused.-"discriminate members of one gender more".I commend you for using such a ridiculous loophole but it serves no purpose.I used that example to show you that you can "discriminate members of the male gender more" too(.But it seems a too complicated concept for you to understand).Ultimately I take it you disagree that it's possible...
Leave men to rot and die.
Help the distressed women.
Hurray equality!

I don't get my own thesis?That's an interesting assumption .I don't classify any of the sexes as "weaker" or "stronger" that's why i think you should help out men too.Society thinks they can just suck it up because they're the "stronger" sex.That's what i'm trying to tell you for some time now...
Well i could do a little correction about the 9/11 example:Imagine you had a Extremist real talk show making fun of it 2-3 days after it happened.Oh and no one wants to punish the guys that blew up the towers, it's fine.But if an American blew up something you'd have a public outrage.That's a precise example of discrimination.By the way these people I showed you aren't comedians.They're totally serious.You're still trying to justify it god....(facepalm)But we are making slow and painful progress, at least now you admit chopping a man's genitals off is "inappropriate".Like someone gets his balls chopped off in front of you and you're like:"Man that wasn't very appropriate,meh wanna go eat something afterwards?"You wanna do a little study about this thing and society?Go out and ask as many women if it's ok. There will be ones that will say yes and some that say no.Now go out and ask as many feminists if it's ok.Almost all of them will say it is.

Yes sexism is "prejudice or discrimination based on sex".Let me ask you something genius ,how many sexes are there?Apparently you must be sexist to both men and women to classify it as "sexism" huh?
Oh and comedians don't make fun of everything.Wanna know what will happen if they did?This example comes just from the top of my mind:Imagine a bunch of men made fun of a woman who got her clit and breasts chopped off on national television.Guys/gals like you will be the first to say it's wrong and rightfully so.The show will be shut down, the casters will be sued and the man who mutilated his wife will be sent to prison and probably executed.But hey "women are still the ones in the worse position" right?
You still deny the existence of sexism towards men, you seem to think helping them out is wrong, you even seem to think the video i showed you is ok. You wanna hear something funny , it's always people like you who support feminism *cough feminists cough* that are ok with such things.The very last thing you are is "open minded".And why the *** are you still talking about racism i thought we cleared that the analogy is retarded.I think it's useless to talk to people like you.You can have the last word if you want.(It will probably be something about Martin Luther King again...)

If you can be racist or sexist IT IS PRECISELY towards one race or one sex.Want examples of what's "out of my house"?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrvDhSB7GHk
This is a video of a bunch of women making fun of a man who's penis got chopped off by his wife on national television.The man divorced her so "you go gurl".Apparently all of the viewers think it's fine."I mean pffft he's a man right?"

At that time people were only racist to black people.That's why it was correct to help them and that's why it was the same as working towards equality.At the current time people are sexist to both men and women and the people claiming to work towards "equality" are only helping women.Thus i think your analogy is kinda retarded.Also If you have a scale and you're placing weights on only one of the sides indefinitely ,you're bound to make it unequal.Even if the side you're loading was lower, you will reach the point in time where you will be doing the opposite of equalizing it.(You will do a fine job if you stop at some point but we all know that's not happening)

Feminazis is just an insult people use to call feminists, I still think that if you want to equalize something ,you must work for both sides, not just one of them.Feminism is just about empowering females.

Well Martin Luther King didn't ask white people to be placed in prison for "equality" did he?