Yeah the whole AI bubble is such a mess, all the companies are racing to become top dog in AI before their debt catches up to them without realizing that very few people are willing to pay the actual price of having AI do their job...

most gay stuff since the previous post i guess

in university it's a different story,

When you say 'let them fail' you just don't realise how teenagers work. If you encourage teenagers to use AI they will jump all in into that shit and you'll end up with like half an entire generation of people who are unable to figure out how to get warm water without asking a computer first.

Honestly i doubt your teachers don't know you're using AI to work. The actual stance i've seen is that if it's proper good work and it feels like the student actually understands what they are saying, it's fine if they've used ai correctly.

Should we be teaching kids a responsible approach ? idk, it's really hard to do and we learnt just fine with books and hard work for centuries... I personally believe AI should be used as a tool to accelerate boring or repetitive tasks, and if you consider scholarly learning to be boring well maybe it's just not for you and that's fine to recognize too.

as i teacher i don't forbid ai because it's cheating, I forbid it because students who use ai are completely incapable of checking if whatever the machine spewed at them is correct.

This is a major issue because further learning requires you to have the prerequisite understandings I'm teaching. If students don't have those notions, they will still be able to use AI to answer more complicated stuff, but the gap between what they are asking the models and what they understand will keep growing and they'll end up locked in a situation where all they can do is to parrot a machine and realise they've wasted years of their life.

To be fair, snowboarding sober is basically impossible. You can't be fully rational to practice that sport.

To be fair the first affirmation is dumb af. It's obviously all the hugelol admins at the same time.

Priviat !

to be fair, the practical use of an icbm is pretty low, like who the hell picks a fight with people on another continent ? Gotta be incredibly imperialist to do that kinda shit.

I mean it all depends on why you're playing. For me a large part of the fun in single player games is to find broken combos and unexpectedly strong interactions. Bonus points if it's silly and relies on somewhat unreliable things.
a lot of recent games have gone the way of making everything work equally, which means no matter what you do you can kind of expect the same end result and that's kinda boring no ?

I am ok with balancing if something is both particularly broken and easy to figure out, making the rest of the game's possibility all feel pathetic in comparison.

yeah that turn the other cheek has been taken so much out of context, it really didn't mean what you'd think it means nowadays.