orcomarcio · 4-Year Club · 2 points ·
And I found my girlfriend there by playing support and matching with her adc on ladder.
We've been almost 4 years together now.

orcomarcio · 4-Year Club · 1 points ·
You laugh but I wish I knew this trick during my school years

orcomarcio · 4-Year Club · 3 points ·
Ye it's black people's fault they don't have welfare

orcomarcio · 4-Year Club · 2 points ·
E G G

orcomarcio · 4-Year Club · 2 points ·
cashier --> gets the order wrong?

orcomarcio · 4-Year Club · 1 points ·
Pasta shapes are for us Italians what shoes are for women

orcomarcio · 4-Year Club · 1 points ·
Shh he probably has a Phd in virology, let's hear him out

orcomarcio · 4-Year Club · 19 points ·
"Tis' african matey be feasting on beans!"

orcomarcio · 4-Year Club · 1 points · *
Ok I poorly explained myself. I wasn't saying that we should judge how someone is successful by evolution standards, I know it's a random process and we evolved consciousness with which we can find better values by ourselves.

What I was trying to say is that doesn't make sense the argument that "is unfair that when a man gets a lot of women it's called a playboy and when a female does she's being promiscuous". Evolution gave (generally speaking) female a stronger drive to find a suitable partner, while men have more drive to mate everyone. Generally speaking being a "***" is way easier than being a playboy and I'm pretty sure this is nothing controversial.

Of course I'm not commenting on the morality (or lack of) of any of this behaviors. According to anthropologists it seems like monogamy was a necessary cultural evolution to render society less violent, but I'm stepping out of what I'm sure of here.

orcomarcio · 4-Year Club · 1 points ·
I'm not saying that the evolution that worked when we were hunters/gatherers still applies today since (in insight I explained poorly what i meant to say).


:(