B

Core

That last paragraph is hilarious. You still have no understanding of the actual problem of quantum entanglement and you keep using it to justify your garbage.

Quantom mechanics says that it's impossible to accurately measure a subatomic particle's position and energy at the same time. That's why it introduces the formalism of wave functions to describe a particle's state as a sort of probability function. Quantum entanglement arises when you have two identical PARTICLES in the same quantum state (same wave function). Due to Pauli's exclusion principle these two particles must have opposite spins, but we don't know which one is "up" and which one is "down", so we write the state as a 50% probability for each. This means that the states are identical. Now imagine that those two particles begin to move in the opposite directions, we still have no idea of their spins, but we can now separate them based on their location. At this point you can measure the spin of one particle and instantly know the spin of the other one, even if it's a million miles away. This phenomenon is called quantum entanglement, and the two particles were entangled.

You could interpret the measurement as a change of state of the other particle, because if you write the wave function before and after, they're obviously different in the spin part. Or if you were slightly more reasonable, you could interpret it for what it is: the particles were always in a different state, we just didn't know it until we measured it. Einstein has no issues with that.

I don't call you a retard for disagreeing, I call you a retard because you don't know why, or even what specifically, you're disagreeing with. You just want to feel special for believing something else than the norm.

I'll leave you with a last little treat, why do you think particle physics is largely valid? You had problems with quantum entanglement before (this is particle physics). A large portion of the field is studying cosmic particles, which doesn't function if they don't arrive from where they're supposed to. And just so you know, particle physics models are incredibly flawed, because we can't directly observe the interactions of particles, and many scientists think they're wrong (including me). That is an excellent reinforcement of my theory that you're a retard, with no idea what you're talking about.

You said that you lack brainpower to unravel every intricate lie. Since you also failed to dispove anything in all of your comments, I correctly assumed that you are too dumb to dispute any established scientific fact. Pedo or not pedo.

My work is in nuclear physics, where it's especially common to be harrased by whining morons, who don't know what they're talking about.

"Often in the wrong place" I wanted specifics goddammit. It's great to know you have no faith in my lab work, despite knowing nothing about it. Would you like a specific example about something that you especially think is wrong about our models? Just give me a problem you have and I'll see if I did anything related.

It's much, much easier to discover the truth, than it is to fabricate a consistent system that explains 99% of reality, while being fundamentaly wrong.

I do not agree to disagree, because my interest in your worldview only exists due to your tendecy to spout your garbage on every post. You are not smart enough (your own words) to have a right to doubt reality, since you can't prove or disprove any statements. And there's a chance that your bullshit will eventually reach another moron like yourself. Then the people who helped create every convenience in the modern world, have to waste their time explaining shit that you should have learned when you were 10.

You didn't answer my first question, you didn't name a specific problem and as I assumed you don't know what quantum entaglement or dark matter is.

I have personally tested about 6 semesters worth of these claims. I no longer need to trust "some expert", because I can trust myself, like you do, except I actually know things.

Gravity on earth was originally measured by stuff on earth, but the universal law of gravity, which we use to predict the orbit of all known planets (and to predict gravity on earth), was determined from movements of the planets in our solar system. So we're measuring things outside the "dome" that happen to align perfectly with everything in the dome. How neat is that?

How is it in any way useful to "craft lies" about our universe when every idiot on the planet can test them and find out they're false? Can you name one problem of the "crafted lies" that measure the rules of the universe? I mean more specifically, because you sure as hell don't know what quantum entanglement or dark matter is. Of course you have the right to ignore me or say whatever you want, but the only reason to do that is if you don't believe/understand the shit you say.

Oh my god, you tried to find a better image. Good job, this one is a little better, but it still has some critical flaws. It's obviously trying to imitate the magnetic field of a permanent magnet, so now you have to explain what's creating the field. The next issue is, again, with the field lines. They're connected now, so good job on that, but for some reason they start spiraling instead of going in the shortest (straight) path. Also what's the low-res shit supposed to be?

It's not expensive overall, just the startup costs are very high. What's a ***ed up country to you? Canada? They are one of the larges miners of uranium and if you don't like it you could mine your own in wherever you're from. But most countries don't mine it, because it's not worth investing in mining, when the fuel is already so cheap.