have you played ds2? not hating, just asking. it's not a bad game, it just has some weird design choices made around it being hard but also trying to make it accessible to new people and the scholar of the first sin really ***ed some enemy positions

only upvoted because it's a tweet from the white tiger king

this isn't accurate at all, the word "***" comes from "negro" which is the spanish word for black, people who speak english started saying *** from the spanish word. the word "Negrito" which is used in the post just means little black, which in argentina is used as a general term without racial intent even for white people in a lot of cases.

she obviously had racist intent, i'm not saying she didn't, but she didn't use a slur like *** or even close to that

weird realizing that die antwoord interpolated this for their song, weird connection

i know, but i had the image and the joke was right there

the most inaccurate thing is the argentinian bear being white

*** it, i'm high and have many arguments to make and opinions to give.

There is a lot of contempt with pornstars that talk against the industry of pornography and i feel that many people only take the stance of "*** what that *** says she wanted the money and she sold her image" when i believe that this is an issue much closer to intellectual property of your own image and work which by itself is a complex issue not only legally but also morally. I compare it in a way with the entitlement an artistic interpreter has to their rendition of whatever it makes, original or not..

Many people that react morally with outrage that a pornstar is trying to reclaim the intellectual property of the videos she made are in my opinion angry that they lose, in a way, control over what they only consider a sexual object and not a person

is hypocritical of her to make these movies and now repent when the consequences were obvious from the beginning?? yeah, totally. nonetheless she can fight for the chance to do it anyways and i don't see why normal people oppose it when 1- the internet is a forever archive (for the practical use of anybody with half a brain her material will be as available as ever) 2 - the only people that lose something from this are the producers (come on, i don't have to spell for anyone that it's the jews)

i think this isn't about objetification at all. even if i have no real information i'm very confident that these pornstars are paid for the act (only once all together without royalties) so right now these are not a money source for her anymore. because of the fame she now has she can make money from her image without taking her clothes off (she not only participated in many influencer spheres but also promoted many things like nfts and things like that). why would she allow things that don't make money for her anymore to make money for the producers when she can take actions? even if it's childish it is a bussiness move in my opinion.

TL:DR
She doesn't mind being objectified, she doesn't like to not make money from it anymore. she is willing to objectify herself anytime it gives her a benefit

the point here is that if she didn't do porn she wouldn't have any fame to speak of. She is only relevant because of that, now saying "forget why i'm relevant but keep giving me attention" is a very picky thing. personal moral judgement aside sasha grey had a super graceful retirement because she owned it and after that the whole thing was a no issue, the same people that consume porn are the ones that condemn, once you do that you take away a big deal of their power. but again, some people want to have their cake and eat it too