Your way of thinking is too abstract to respond to more than one sub-conversation in a thread?

Genius over here

This is just sad...

Do you even think? Like, I cannot even fathom just writing words with no logical pattern.

I'm not a socialist. I'm probably overall right of center across the board. That has nothing to do with identifying patterns in someone's words. Not that you would know anything about understanding what another person has said...

Also, the trinity is a brain dead concept that isn't canon to the original scripture. You'd know that if you actually read a bible. You have proven yourself unable to comprehend a few sentences in plain English, here, so I doubt you'd get much out of trying anyways.

This is like my 4th time doing this with werfer. I don't comment online very often so this is my therapeutic outlet

You can't point out a single instance of me being incorrect in any of our interactions, ever.

You also have no idea about my political affiliations. I've never told you anything - I've just told you when you've been wrong.

You are so far left on the Dunning Kruger curve on every topic it hurts to exist on the same planet as you.

You already made this comment, moron.

I like how you were called out on moving the goalpost and then not understanding the meaning of "moving the goalpost" and instead of looking it up to see if you were in fact wrong, you triple down and use it incorrectly again. lol

That is one of the many differences between you and me - I actually learn when I am wrong and improve. You are just stuck in your moronic ways.

Also, jesus christ isn't a god of anything and may not have even been a real person. If he was, he certainly wasn't white, and if he was alive today, he would absolutely be a socialist ahahahahaa. You are a sheep and your religion is grossly incoherent

Jesus christ. Apart from the fact they you clearly have no idea what "moving the goalpost" means, you are also severely lacking in reading comprehension skills.

Sweet goalpost moving. I don't care about your perversions.

You asked a dumb question and received an answer that undermined your original point.

>Be 1895: Motor vehicles not normal
>Be 1995: Motor vehicles normal