TotallyRepost · Verified · 1 points ·
My peen says "GHB is cheap"

TotallyRepost · Verified · 1 points · *
low-effort r*ddit sloptier platitudinal advice stripped of its meaning
Let's be honest this echoing of overselling simple improvements as complete solutions is less about helping the other but more about being performative
Let them eat cake levels of divorced from reality.

Not saying that you posted in bad faith. It does help in cases of mild depression. But anything more severe than that and this advice boils down to >no money? >try being not poor, it really helps!

TotallyRepost · Verified · 7 points ·


TotallyRepost · Verified · 2 points ·
Zased. Still miss my GF who cheated on me. Zamn

TotallyRepost · Verified · 7 points ·
The bureaucracy of spite. Rules not for fairness, but to passively express disapproval or control. It's almost stereotypical of german culture, especially in early online places like forums and other sites. You don't confront or discuss, you silently put up rules and regulation. I think it was common enough that most had the joy of experiencing or observing some form of it.

TotallyRepost · Verified · 7 points · *
Good. They are strongest when they explain scientific concepts. Though recently their videos very often included moral or ideological framing through selective emphasis, which can influence how viewers interpret the topic.
It's commendable that they cite sources, but those sources are often difficult for the average viewer to parse. Still, that's not their fault per se. It is up to the viewers and parents to help the younger audiences to evaluate the content critically. (Not that the average guy can parse academic papers anyway LOL. So it's performative rigor at best anyway.)

Also if you're losing to slop then it is more telling for your content than theirs.
As in they grew large enough to develop an institution-like brain, it is sanded down and all that is left is polish, pacing and a branded(tm) sense of wonder. AI can mimic that easily.

TotallyRepost · Verified · 3 points ·
Shift your marketing to those who still have wealth

TotallyRepost · Verified · 2 points ·
Yes, it is 4% annually
10M*4%=400k
400k/12 Months=~34k/Month

TotallyRepost · Verified · 13 points ·
Snapping
Pros:
-Tax-free
-Always available
-Cool party trick
Cons:
-Still technically manual labor
-Inflation will eventually *** it

Instant $10M
Pros:
-Massive, no-strings lump sum
-Invest smart, inflation-proof income
-Set-for-life potential
Cons:
-IRS will want answers
-Finite pile, spend it dumb and it's gone

$10M is enough to live comfortably without doing much. Invest it safely at around 4% and you're looking at roughly $34k/month without touching the principal. The tricky part is explaining to tax authorities where it came from without you having a paper trail for it, you might end up googling "how to launder money" and hoping the FBI doesn't read your search history. The snap option is quieter. Unless you push it too far, it's unlikely to raise suspicion. At 0,75 snaps per second for eight hours, you'd make about $216k in a day. Invest that and you could get the best of both worlds. Passive income and infinite top up.
I'd go with the snap.

TotallyRepost · Verified · 5 points ·
Actually based. I think this is less an exercise for the children but rather to emphasize what corpocratic slog is pressed into the minds of the young. That is if the passing adults recognize the subtle criticism.
It also could be that the given teacher actually celebrates this, but I find that more unlikely than the first option; shit wages and working with the current generation tends to push one towards cynicism.


:(