To add on that Empoleon itself also doesn't really look androgynous and is rather masculine coded with the huge hands and having something that evokes the look of a cravat, which are usually associated with masculine formal attire, see men’s aristocratic and military dresses from 17th century onward.
The take only really fits for Greninja and then forward only gen 7 and gen 9 are unambiguously feminine coded

I haven't seen it either, I was extrapolating from random stuff I picked up about the anime lol

It's actually quite an interesting question. If their way of life is inherently harmful to ours, yet they are born or created that way, meaning they have no real choice and were dropped into a ecology they did not design, then coexistence in any meaningful sense may be impossible. If that is the case, is it sufficient justification to expel them, or even to wipe them out entirely?

Basically, if demons are not morally guilty, yet remain fundamentally incompatible with human survival, what can be done, and what should be done?

This raises the justification problem: if harm is unavoidable and asymmetric, does self-defense scale all the way up to eradication? Philosophically, this echoes arguments used to justify the quarantine of incurable carriers, the extermination of invasive species, or preemptive war framed as survival, et cetera.

If coexistence is impossible and one side must vanish (be it containment or eradication), prioritizing one's own species can begin to feel almost tautological. Survival asserts itself. Truly dog eat dog.

From a consequentialist lens, this conclusion may seem acceptable. From a deontological perspective it becomes questionable, as wiping out an entire group feels categorically wrong regardless of the outcome. Virtue ethics meanwhile, is concerned with what such actions ultimately turn us into (what habit, mind and character does it cultivate for example).

My peen says "GHB is cheap"

low-effort r*ddit sloptier platitudinal advice stripped of its meaning
Let's be honest this echoing of overselling simple improvements as complete solutions is less about helping the other but more about being performative
Let them eat cake levels of divorced from reality.

Not saying that you posted in bad faith. It does help in cases of mild depression. But anything more severe than that and this advice boils down to >no money? >try being not poor, it really helps!

Zased. Still miss my GF who cheated on me. Zamn

The bureaucracy of spite. Rules not for fairness, but to passively express disapproval or control. It's almost stereotypical of german culture, especially in early online places like forums and other sites. You don't confront or discuss, you silently put up rules and regulation. I think it was common enough that most had the joy of experiencing or observing some form of it.

Good. They are strongest when they explain scientific concepts. Though recently their videos very often included moral or ideological framing through selective emphasis, which can influence how viewers interpret the topic.
It's commendable that they cite sources, but those sources are often difficult for the average viewer to parse. Still, that's not their fault per se. It is up to the viewers and parents to help the younger audiences to evaluate the content critically. (Not that the average guy can parse academic papers anyway LOL. So it's performative rigor at best anyway.)

Also if you're losing to slop then it is more telling for your content than theirs.
As in they grew large enough to develop an institution-like brain, it is sanded down and all that is left is polish, pacing and a branded(tm) sense of wonder. AI can mimic that easily.

Shift your marketing to those who still have wealth