Well, yeah, it's a bullpup design.

Nah, it's the QBZ-95. I know what you mean though, it looks quite similar the British SA80.

People can disagree. They're just going to be shot. You have made them agree on you with something.

"lol k bye cya when u aint 12 anymore"
Oh, the irony in that statement.

No, you've used power to generate a common agreement. The common agreement doesn't just spontaneously appear. However, it doesn't have to be power in terms of physical force.

What I'm basically saying is that there were completely different attitudes and methods of government at the time. People weren't ostracized for slavery, because they weren't seen as bad.

Most people aren't okay with people being arseholes to other people. Of course, I'm fully aware of how powerful group mentality can be, hence the other incentives.

No, there will. Laws aren't bound to government. A group of free people could still all consent to abide by a law of not stealing from each other, for instance. They will agree to shun those who break this law, and no longer deal with them.

It'll be a missionary, spreading the glory of the master race.

"Let's say coca cola owns the police"
No, they pay a private security force. Different thing. They don't have absolute authority, because there are other security forces. Going around falsely imprisoning people isn't going to work, because they don't have a monopoly on force.

There are laws, as well as the natural law of the market. Few people want to do business with an arsehole.

Actually, gold plays a role in today's economies. It's not used by most people, but people still trade gold.

"hey... gold isn't all that good all that it does is be rare..."
It's been like that for centuries. People still place value in it. It's valuable, because people give it value, and historically, they always have.

How is it not a law?

Slavery was a colonial thing by people who didn't even consider their slaves to be human. That's vastly different from what I'm suggesting.

If you can make everyone you point the gun at obey, then yes, you are enforcing it.

I want people to be able to decide what to do with their lives and their property.

That is a law. A law doesn't require a state, but merely someone to enforce it.

Like I said, people will agree to laws that punish aggressive action.

Having a shiny badge doesn't give you legitimacy, either.