Without any offspring you at some point will not have anything to lose anymore and be free to hold the evils of the world accountable. jk

Isaiah 54:16

bat

Except the lower one is legit. Wifi can be used to map a house.

I thought it was the new owners who went to the cops, not the CEO. And that the CEO was just the one who got them the gig, possibly with the information about the possible shady shit they could pull but I thought none of that could be confirmed.
Also wasn't one of the cops buddies with the new owner?

Of course they will. Before I continue let me clarify that I consider the family who owned the collection the victim here.

I think BaM corporate can prove they did "the best they could" (but really the least they legally had to) given the information that was available to them.

It seems to me, and I only started reading up on this 20 min ago, that a large portion of the collection had already been sold under the agreement. This means the 200k that you hear about it is not actually the worth of the remaining portion. It is just the buzz number that makes this story popular.
And the story should be popular cause it is likely that the victims were still missing out on at least 60k of merchandise and this was the only way for them to get that money back.

The real villains here are the new owners who did really try to conceal the existing deal. The reason why the new owners tried to is unclear, maybe they didn't want to risk getting sued by corporate cause this deal was technically not allowed while operating under the BaM brand. Maybe they actually thought they could get away with it cause 60k+ merchandise that isn't allowed to be on the books sounds like a steal. Which is what it is, stealing.

That doesn't mean the old owner isn't without blame either. They made a deal they weren't allowed to make while working under the BaM brand. If they didn't know then they should have checked. If they did know they were possibly hiding it from corporate and pocketing the money they made of the deal instead of listing it as revenue of the store.

Dumb ways to di-ie

Now that sounds more feasible. Mostly because you actually did it so it was apparently feasible.

Probably but then your quiz only works for the 0.000001% of the population that have played enough games to find enough to make it fun for them.