Still way more than I would've expected. My morbid curiosity can wait until I can get it for 5 bucks. Is it on of game pass or something? Who pays for that shit full price on release?

? I don't get what you're trying to say here...

There is one difference that causes all of this: Valve is privately owned. You cannot purchase valve stock. Every other game company people hate is publicly traded. If you do not have to chase higher and higher profits from shareholder meeting to shareholder meeting, you do not need to find ever-new ways to increase profitability. Investors always expect their shares to increase in value. If they don't, they'll cash out. So publicly traded companies must become anti-consumer eventually bc you need to find more money any way you can but no market cap is infinite. So they hike up the prices and reduce the services for as long as the gold rush lasts. Everyone cashes out eventually and someone always ends up holding the bag. Public awareness of how publicly traded companies work remains low, meaning that fleecing customers keeps happening. As long as the majority of customers aren't aware of how this system operates, this shit will keep happening. Meanwhile the people who profit off the stock market have every reason to not enlighten the general public about how this is a losing game for them in 99% of cases.

The scales are clearly different here, but what is true about this is that right-nogs destroyed something they owned, not someone's else's property. People who wanted to get rid of their Tesla *sold* theirs. And destroying someones car is much more egregious than a can of beer.

But don't worry about the hypocrisy guys they are, as always, preventing the rise of the fourth Reich. By acting like a bunch of deranged spastics. Which they are. So it's not acting...

Based. Wait...does your neighbour have a weird hat and a full beard? How does he feel about jesus? As I am writing this I realised how difficult it is to distinguish the Amish from the orthodox Jews...

If nobody got me I know Adolf Hitler (Namibia) got me.

International women's day was a couple days ago. Poser.

Can anyone explain to me where I was asked if I'm cool with this?

He's right though. There are many ass-old idiots who never had any talent and didn't even attempt to improve. It's conventional wisdom bc longer time alive means more experience. It's not a categoric fact in all cases just a general rule.

He is phrasing it unwisely though which is opening him up to getting attacked for his statement. He should phrase it in the reverse: "Nobody can explain to me how being younger necessarily/automatically makes you less competent." Now he's not shitting on the old guys but requesting a justification of bias against him. Nobody can "how dare you?" him now. But if he's 22 he probably lacks the experience to consider that lmao.
Pic related.