HUGELOL

Post reply: https://hugelol.com/lol/997194

Fruitcake · 2 points ·

This is one of those people who I firmly believe would completely change their political beliefs if they just got a bit of physical exercise and stopped watching trap porn.

Post reply: https://hugelol.com/lol/997051

Fruitcake · 0 points ·

lmao i completely forgot you were the OP I thought it was sonichu...Should've commented under one of his comments...*** it too late now.

Post reply: https://hugelol.com/lol/997051

Fruitcake · 1 points ·

Disclaimer: I have attempted to edit this shit and upload it like 5 times now with settings that have always worked before bc I hate having edited/commented videos of shit like this, but this is the next best thing ig.

This news report shows the incident from the ICE agents perspective mostly unedited.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGmJN7pYNM4

The comment I typed out like 5 times as well:

"Just have a look at this and make your own judgement. For the record: I still think you're wrong and I'm right."

Post reply: https://hugelol.com/lol/997051

Fruitcake · 1 points · *

Tbh I do not know what SOP is for these guys. I would be surprised if what you just said is outlined like this in some police manual. Maybe it is, but I doubt it. To me this sounds like a whole lot of conjecture that I could only counter with more conjecture of my own, which will derail everything I say.

What it looked like to me is that he came from the other side to support the other officers. I can't see how he ends up being in front of the hood. My guess is that he comes up to it after seeing her going a little bit in reverse at first, not expecting her to floor it directly after in his direction.

Again, pointless conjecture. But conjecture that does not require me to presume that some random ICE officer is a bloodthirsty tyrant hatching a master plan to get a free kill within a couple seconds of action. And as Occam's razor dictates: The theory that makes the least amount of improbable assumptions is likely the correct one.

Or conversely: "Theories that make a lot of those are likely bunk."

Also: Was he an idiot for putting himself in harms way like that, or was he creating a situation intentionally in which he could kill her? Your presumptions aren't even consistent *within the same sentence*. Is he a rookie with no knowledge of SOP, or is he a mastermind preying on his next victim?

And none of that changes anything about the fact that *she was speeding towards him and could have killed him*.

Post reply: https://hugelol.com/lol/997051

Fruitcake · 4 points ·

have yourself a breather buddy. You'll wake up tomorrow realizing you were being dramatic and retarded. Probs too proud to admit it, but that's just as well.

Post reply: https://hugelol.com/lol/997051

Bad comment hidden. Click to view.

Fruitcake · -2 points ·

I really hope you reading your own comment does not sound convincing to you lol

Post reply: https://hugelol.com/lol/997051

Bad comment hidden. Click to view.

Fruitcake · -3 points ·

literally every adjective is a lie.
driving away => Put her vehicle in their path and then sped towards one of them

power-hungry => ICE is only there in person going door to door because they are a federal agency and the local democratic government is refusing to do what people voted for. They'd much rather not be freezing their asses off and just have the local PDs/court houses etc. deliver criminal aliens into their custody voluntarily.

trigger-happy => ICE officers have been shot at, rammed with cars, assaulted, harrased, doxxed etc. for months. These people only go as far as they can get away with. The fact that they doing all this shit and this is the first person that got shot is pretty amazing trigger discipline.

law-breaking => literally executing legal warrants based on the most popular policy of the current president that won the popular vote. Being obstructed by criminals every step of the way.

unaccountable => Everyone puts every step they do under the microscope. Just like right now. If they were unaccountable, nobody would be talking about this case in such a way. ICE would just ***ing dome people left and right and all these asshats would not be out here making noise. In Florida there are protesters standing on the side of the road, not rioters and domestic terrorists in them. Because the police chief simply told people: "If you throw bricks at our officers we'll let your family know where to collect your remains."

You don't have these scenes in Florida, because there the local PDs just cooperate with the elected government.

I actually thought you were better than this. ***ing sad.

Post reply: https://hugelol.com/lol/997051

Fruitcake · 3 points ·

...Are you calling me an Indian?

Post reply: https://hugelol.com/lol/997051

Bad comment hidden. Click to view.

Fruitcake · -2 points · *

No i don't. The officer does not know the aftermath of a car running towards him. Every criticism I have read so far only makes sense if the officer is precognisant and expected to maintain robotic composure in a life-threatening situation.

How would you feel if someone told you: "Well you didn't know if shooting at the threat barreling towards you would make a difference in the end during the split-second that it happened. So you shouldn't have done it to begin with."

We might just as well been sitting here after the car crippled him for life.

Post reply: https://hugelol.com/lol/997051

Fruitcake · 2 points ·

whine all you want: she was speeding towards him after committing several crimes to put herself in that situation to begin with. Dude's life was clearly in danger => Justified shooting.

Also:
If you put every law enforcement officer on leave because of wild shit that happened on duty because they might do something drastic when their life is in danger, you might as well surrender your country to criminal rule. I don't even think the officer was mentally unstable. He just reacted to a threat to his life.

At this point you're just moving the goal post any way you can so you don't have to admit that you're wrong on this one. My guess: you just dislike the Feds and Vance.

If she didn't want to get shot she should've just:

- not blocked the road with her car
- Interfered with officers carrying out legal orders
- refused to get out when detained
- sped ahead at law enforcement holding a gun

This case does not make me fear for my civil liberties in the slightest.

Idk what makes you sperg out like that but its ***ng weird to watch.