Iirc this post got banned on X because it counted as prostitution confession or some shit.

Yes it implies that my pp is hard.

Where is your data on that. Did you do a peer reviewed study? Got it published? Was it decimated once it got published or do people that actually do that research refer to it as well?

If answer to all of this is yes or thereabouts then by all means tell me what the actual capability of our measurements is.

The information is accurately presented, if you actually read it within its context. Its a popular science (self admittedly) so it obviously won't sum up the grand total of human research, and it still contains warnings about margins of error, statistical outliers and likely standard deviation.

That you then feel the need to append "well this is the only part we have actually measured" is a retarded take that you felt the need to append for god knows what reason when anyone who spent five minutes on the subject is aware that yes, we only started measuring then, but we are also entirely capable of analyzing general climate trends from geological research.

The information was accurately presented, you just needed to read it like a normal person. Something you clearly can't be accused of being on account of being obsessed with diagnoses of hysteria.

the difference between 70% alcohol solution and 71% alcohol solution in sterilization is non zero and enables the risk of infection from sterilized material. This happens because any stronger than 70% and the solution sears the cell walls of bacteria so quickly that it can form a scarred shell while preserving the cell itself. That single percentage matters.

Similarily, when you are talking about change of 1-4 (from "has already happened and we are seeing big ***ing differences" to "nightmare scenario that probably won't come to pass unless some doomers are very correct about the methane apocalypse") it doesn't matter that the changes are relatively small because they upset the established balance too quickly for the system to coursecorrect.

We are, as a matter of fact, observing more weather related disasters in last decade. We've seen years in the past when things were worse but not consistently multiple years in a row, We are also seeing some areas that were already hot enough to make life difficult (IE india) go into temps that are nearly inimical to human life.

Thats the biggest ***ing joke in all this. The same retarded rightoids that deny climate change are also the same people that are pearlclutching about migrant and also the same people that laugh at "libtard" ecologically concerned people, ignoring the fact that if africa and parts of asia, (India in particular) become completely inhospitable, it will make the current refugee issues about hundred times worse.

Everyone shooting themselves in the foot because they are shortsighted ***s married to ruining environment.But yeah sure, lets ignore the issue like retards because "authorities" (very few of whom actually are doing anything meaningful, its all driven by scientists who have no actual power) tell us to do things that we don't 100% agree with. Because i would rather eat ten cookies right now and then starve to death than space them out across the month because someone dared to say i should do the latter and not the former.

Can't decide if upvote because triple layer joke or downvote because Please just stop is a sentiment i can get behind.

Yeah the glacial scare of 70ties because scientists predicted a minor ice age coming back. Which didn¨t happen because it was a minor ice age of which we had like 3 in past two thousand years (refer back to my comment about journalists being retarded and actively disastrous for avg human understanding of severity of something) and because thats when the global warming started to overtake natural trends.

But scientists aren't predicting "minor inconvenience" rn.

And authorities aren't telling you shit (outside of EU which finally understood that there might be some serious issues if shit isn't being done after 30 years of scientist appeals), authorities have been completely ignoring the scientists who have been saying there are problems coming our way since Carl Sagan raised the topic in public spaces in like, 90ties .80ties maybe.

It ain¨t ***ing Mythology. You can't analyze yearly weather patterns 20000 years back, sure, but you can make a very good estimate of what climate for a given area was for an era, from geological data.

Thats why there are those enormous spikes mentioned as possible outliers in the model. You can get a general feel of how the climate some 10000 years ago was, but you can't predict if there was a couple of years inbetween 10000 years BCE and 9900 BCE where the weather for the year spiked 4 degrees up inexplicably.

But the general trend should be fairly accurate, especially because if you actually look at it it has a very generous margin of error.

EDIT: ignoring this shit because "uh couldn't've been measured with a thermometer so there is no way to know" is like a ***ing baby assuming the parent disappeared because they did a peekaboo.

In general global warming is ***ing dire, but whats even direr is the way that modern news reporting completely ***ing ruined the ability of your average person to grasp the issue because the newspeople will go to some scientist who is running an extreme case model, hear out like three words out of his mouth, go report GLOBAL WARMING APOCALYPSE NEXT WEEK and when that inevitably does not actually happen, retards with two braincells go "well then global warming is clearly hoax".

It doesn't help that weather science is finnicky as hell because holy shit is atmosphere complex, so even the eggheads keep over or undershooting crap in their models which they are constantly refining. The only thing the academic community can "mostly" [Because science never has everyone agree 100%, thats why its science, its constantly tested hypotheses being challenged] agree on is that its happening, that its happening orders of magnitude faster than it should be, and that this is very not good and we should do something about it stat because weather engineering on global scale is not something you can pull off in a weekend.

Most of this is casually observable by looking up long term weather trends for specific areas and seeing them buckling in a bad way.

But in general i just blame poor ***ing reporting. I ***ing hate journalists so much its unreal (unless they are investigative journalists, those guys are goated).

EDIT: also, a very nice pop-sci XKCD comic about the topic. Climate change denial is making me salty https://xkcd.com/1732/

Both are retarded. Global warming is visible mostly in long term trends. Showing it off with one day is moronic, unless the temp goes higher than historic maximum.