ew, cat dint shave its armpits

funny.

actually i do watch porn but still dint know her. i was just curious if someone this misled actually exists and googled "Emilly Swaven". turns out the troll triggered quite a response.

it's a troll account https://sirfrogsworth.tumblr.com/post/625401348482056192/im-seeing-a-lot-of-people-tweeting-outrage-to

also Rommel: can u send us some artillery and food? we are in El Alamein

"we operate on such different levels of intellect and education"
for once we can agree on sth. i can tell the difference between a run-on sentence and a half sentence, you can't (not even after it's been explained to you, which really constitutes a whole new level of idiocy). i know a conversation starts at its beginning, you think a conversation starts with the reply to a reply to the actual start of the conversation. i know if someone says he's been purposefully using half sentences, it implies he's not been using full sentences, while you are unable to come to that conclusion. i've been answering your question before, you are just too stupid to have noticed. and now i've answered it again. did you get it this time? i'd be surprised.

you're a prime example of the dunning-kruger-effect. it was fun to see you humiliate yourself for a while, but now it's getting boring. go find someone else to dominate you

the golden retriever: the golden retriever of golden retrievers

instahooked

bs meme https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267743102_Do_dogs_follow_behavioral_cues_from_an_unreliable_human

rofl. i'm not saying my english is great. like i already said, i'm not a native speaker. to me, english is a foreign language. but you are just talking out of your ass.

although it's not limited to this, it gets most clear in the follwing two examples:

"First of all, I picked your initial reply because it's where we started our conversation"
> well, if you mean "first reply", then don't use the expression "initial comment". the two are entirely different things. it's funny that you complain about my english when you yourself are so obviously unable to express your thoughts. also, our conversation did NOT start with my reply to your reply to my initial comment. that's like saying a book starts with chapter 3. you can count to three, can't you?

"As for run-on sentences, your inability to use caps and commas creates (inadvertently, I suppose) run-on sentences out of those choppy little segments"
> not at all. like i already explained: these "choppy little segments" are the complete opposite of run-on sentences. two half sentences do NOT make a run-on sentence. let's take a look at the example you chose:
"It is insulting to most women to tell them they look like men. Because they don't want to look like men. They want to look like women. Because they want to be beautiful."
that's two times two half sentences.
making two sentences out of one is NOT the same as making one sentence out of two. this would be a run-on sentence:
"It is insulting to most women to tell them they look like men because they don't want to look like men they want to look like women because they want to be beautiful."
look it up if you don't believe me.

the fact that you didn't know that doesn't mean you're stupid, it only means you're uneducated. what makes you stupid is the fact that you'd still neglect that even after i patiently explained it to you.

"I won't be replying anymore"
> that's wise. at least this way you won't disgrace yourself even more than you already did.

:D this was not my initial comment. "initial comment" does not mean "first reply". the initial comment is the first comment. i expressly asked about the initial comment because it's also the one you expressly referred to earlier.

btw in the comment you now refer to instead of the initial comment i asked about, i use short half-sentences cos they are easier to understand, especially for ppl with special needs. it's not meant to be literarily appealing but to be simple. since you were complaining about my previous comments, i made this one extra foolproof just for you. frankly, you're being a bit ungrateful here.

also, a "run-on-sentence" is the opposite of what you think it is. "like this. that sound like you're dictating. a telegram. to your secretary. full stop." are NOT run-on-sentences. a run-on-sentence fuses two or more sentences in an improper manner, it doesn't tear sentences apart.

beyond that, i repeated the same words because this also makes things easier to understand. again: it's not meant to be literarily appealing but to be simple. this "grade-school"-style perfectly fits your intellectual level and that's why i chose it. it's target group oriented. you're welcome.

there is no implication that men can't be beautiful whatsoever. most women not wanting to look like men cos they think it's more beautiful for them to look like women does not imply that men can't be beautiful. just like most men not wanting to look like women cos they think it's more beautiful for them to look like men does not imply that women can't be beautiful. it's really quite simple.

when you said "No I understand the concept just fine." i thought you meant you understood the concept just fine, but obviously you didn't. just let me know if you need further help to comprehend this.

all the time and energy i save by not capitalizing indeed is spent on something very important: doing whatever the f*ck i want.